Only compare source and sink in SARIF comparison#3772
Merged
Conversation
aeisenberg
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
Contributor
aeisenberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice. Typo in a comment, and good to merge after that.
Contributor
|
Did we need to update the CHANGELOG for this at all? |
koesie10
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
Member
Author
Good call, this will update the changelog: #3780 |
koesie10
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
…ngelog Update CHANGELOG for #3772
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This changes the SARIF comparison to only include the source and the sink of a path as an input into the comparison. This will result in a more useful comparison by filtering out results that are the same except for their path.
The results of a comparison on this branch:
The same comparison on
main: